EUDiF

Typology of institutions

When mapping the diaspora engagement of 110 countries we identified 430+ public or semi-public institutions involved in diaspora engagement. Subsequently, we endeavored to understand the evolution of the institutional landscape and we analysed these institutions in order to propose different categories of institutions and sectors of intervention.

The typology demonstrates that there is no one configuration, but many options to learn from, test and tailor to a particular context. It is a resource that can be used to inspire institutional development and diversification, and to identify peer learning opportunities.

Global

Types of institutions

Africa
View region
Use the controls below to view different regions
Use the controls below to view different regions
Eastern Europe & Central Asia
View region
Use the controls below to view different regions
Latin America & the Caribbean
View region
Use the controls below to view different regions
Middle East
View region
Use the controls below to view different regions
Pacific
View region
Use the controls below to view different regions
Timelines

Governments have been formally engaging their diasporas since the 1800s, for example the Mexican Secretariat of Foreign Affairs has been doing so since 1821. There are other pioneers around the world, including China and Lebanon. In the 1970s institutions started to emerge progressively, particularly in Asia, but institutionalisation was sporadic and uneven until the 1990s.

The following timelines show the great diversification and wide distribution of diaspora institutions as of this time, as well as key moments in recent history which have driven interest in diaspora engagement.